![]() I'm about to list this in the for sale forum, so PM me if you're interested. The 4 in ear drivers on the G95 are all different sizes and sensitivity, and the vibration unit fakes deep bass with a sub bass rumble, but it doesn't really have much in the 20-40hz range. I tried the physical 5.1 G95v2012 too, and I prefer the overall warmer sound of the Sades. ![]() Could be a fluke, but get a squaretrade warranty and buy from ebay if you go Sades just in case. Doesn't seem to be a driver issue, as the driver works with the G927 too. With the brilliant ability of R&D and innovation, SADES creates various gaming peripherals of specific characters to meet. SADES has about 15 years of R&D and manufacturing experience after producing the first headset in 2002. At times it loses amp signal and gets very distorted. SADES focus on R&D and manufacturing gaming headsets, being committed to provide the sound of everything when gaming and leading gamers to immerse themselves in games. ![]() I've already had a sound problem with the Sades though. You can also use Razer surround with it, and the unit does 32bit 96000hz. I even like listening to music on the Sades through foobar. Mids come out slightly more on the G927, it just can't dig as deep (40 vs 50mm driver), and I like my bass. The Somic G927v2012 sounds very good, but lacks in bass compared to the Sades SA-907. Here's what I've found.Įvery Turtle Beach headset I've ever tried (Latest one I had was the Ear Force Tango, $299 at launch) had mediocre overall sound, but did pretty well with virtual surround. I have been trying them and the Somics too.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |